untitled

Carbelide Nelicanya Sectory 04
Page 01

Think of all the ways Carbelide Nelicanya has helped your friends.

Carbelide Nelicanya

Carbelide Nelicanya Home
Carbelide Nelicanya Sitemap
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 01
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 02
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 03
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 04
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 05
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 06
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 07
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 08
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 09
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 10
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 11
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 12
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 13
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 14
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 15
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 16
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 17
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 18
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 19
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 20
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 21
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 22
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 23
Carbelide Nelicanya Sct 24

Carbelide Nelicanya Sectory 04
Page 01

For the last half of the reign of Henry II we have the advantage of a valuable and in some respects very interesting and attractive chronicle. This is the Gesta Regis Henrici Secundi, associated with the name of BENEDICT OF PETERBOROUGH (Rolls Series, 2 vols.). Benedict, however, was not the author, and no certain evidence as to who he was can be derived from any source, nor does the chronicle itself supply many of those incidental indications from which it is often possible to learn much regarding the author of an anonymous book. The tentative suggestion of Bishop Stubbs that it may have been written by Richard Fitz Neal, the author of the Dialogus de Scaccario, is now generally regarded as inadmissible. The work begins in 1170, and from a date a year or two later is evidently contemporaneous to its close in 1192, with perhaps a slight interruption at 1177. It is written in a simple and straightforward way, and with a sure touch, unusual accuracy of statement, and a clear understanding of constitutional details; it suggests an interesting personality in its author, with whom we constantly desire a closer acquaintance. Whoever he was, he possessed good sources of information, though apparently too great consideration for king or court keeps him sometimes from saying all he knows or believes, and he has inserted in his work many letters and important documents.

A new charter was granted in 1609, the council in England being now appointed by the stockholders instead of the king, and the governor of the colony being named by this council. Lord Delaware was made Governor and Captain-General of Virginia, and many more colonists sent out. By a wreck of two of the vessels there was delay in the arrival of the newly chosen officers. Smith, then Percy, meantime continued to exercise authority. This, again, was a critical period. Indians were troublesome. Tillage having been neglected from the first, provisions became exhausted, and a crisis long referred to as "the starving time" ensued. The colony had actually abandoned Jamestown and shipped for England, when met in James River by Lord Delaware, coming with relief. They at once returned, and an era of hope dawned. This was in June, 1610. One hundred and fifty new settlers accompanied Delaware. Planting was vigorously prosecuted, the Indians placated, and still further accessions of people and cattle secured from England.

There is reason to believe that after his reconciliation with the king of England Innocent III had all the letters in which he had threatened John with the severest penalties collected so far as possible and destroyed.[76] It is uncertain, however, whether before the end of 1212 he had gone so far as to depose the king and to absolve his subjects from their allegiance, though this is asserted by English chroniclers. But there is no good ground to doubt that in January, 1213, he took this step, and authorized the king of France to invade England and deprive John of his kingdom. Philip needed no urging. He collected a numerous fleet, we are told, of 1500 vessels, and a large army. In the first week of April he held a great council at Soissons, and the enterprise was determined on by the barons and bishops of France. At the same council arrangements were made to define the legal relations to France of the kingdom to be conquered, The king of England was to be Philip's son, Louis, who could advance some show of right through his wife, John's niece, Blanche of Castile but during his father's lifetime he was to make no pretension to any part of France, a provision which would leave the duchy of Aquitaine in Philip's hands, as Normandy was. Louis was to require an oath of his new subjects that they would undertake nothing against France, and he was to leave to his father the disposal of the person of John and of his private possessions. Of the relationship between the two countries when Louis should succeed to the crown of France, nothing was said. Preparations were so far advanced that it was expected that the army would embark before the end of May.



[ Dir 04 Part 01 ] [ Dir 04 Part 02 ] [ Dir 04 Part 03 ] [ Dir 04 Part 04 ] [ Dir 04 Part 05 ] [ Dir 04 Part 06 ]
[ Dir 04 Part 07 ] [ Dir 04 Part 08 ] [ Dir 04 Part 09 ] [ Dir 04 Part 10 ] [ Dir 04 Part 11 ] [ Dir 04 Part 12 ]


This document is Copyright © 2008 Carbelide Nelicanya. All rights reserved. Do not copy either electronically or otherwise without permission. Links and references to other Websites are not endorsements. Carbelide Nelicanya provides no guarantees or warrantees concerning other sites. Links are only provided as a courtesy and for entertainment purposes only.

Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Allwebco Web Templates · Build your own toolbar · Financial Data · Audio, Fonts, Clipart
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com